Platform: Code4rena
Start Date: 02/08/2023
Pot Size: $42,000 USDC
Total HM: 13
Participants: 45
Period: 5 days
Judge: hickuphh3
Total Solo HM: 5
Id: 271
League: ETH
Rank: 37/45
Findings: 1
Award: $30.61
🌟 Selected for report: 0
🚀 Solo Findings: 0
🌟 Selected for report: Rolezn
Also found by: 0xhex, 0xta, JCK, K42, Rageur, Raihan, ReyAdmirado, SAQ, SY_S, dharma09, hunter_w3b, petrichor, shamsulhaq123, wahedtalash77
30.6063 USDC - $30.61
issue | instance | |
---|---|---|
[G-01] | Use do while loops instead of for loops | 1 |
[G-02] | Functions Guaranteed to revert when called by normal users can be markd payable | 5 |
[G-03] | Use calldata instead of memory for function arguments that do not get mutated | 1 |
[G-04] | Internal functions not called by the contract should be removed to save deployment gas | 1 |
[G-05] | Use assembly to write address storage values | 5 |
[G-06] | Missing zero address check in constructor | 4 |
[G-07] | Do not calculate constants | 1 |
[G-08] | use Mappings Instead of Arrays | 1 |
[G-09] | Avoid contract existence checks by using low level calls | 6 |
[G-10] | Stack variable used as a cheaper cache for a state variable is only used once | 1 |
[G-11] | Can Make The Variable Outside The Loop To Save Gas | 1 |
[G-12] | >= costs less gas than > | 11 |
[G-13] | Use nested if statements instead of && | 2 |
[G-14] | Structs can be packed into fewer storage slots by editing variables | 2 |
[G-15] | Ternary operation is cheaper than if-else statement | 2 |
[G-16] | Use hardcode address instead address(this) | 6 |
[G-17] | Caching global variables is more expensive than using the actual variable (use block.timestamp instead of caching it) | 1 |
A do while loop will cost less gas since the condition is not being checked for the first iteration.
File: libraries/RewardLib.sol 65 for (uint256 i; i < _auctionResultsLength; i++) {
File: src/RngRelayAuction.sol 167 for (uint8 i = 0; i < _rewards.length; i++) {
If a function modifier such as onlyOwner is used, the function will revert if a normal user tries to pay the function. Marking the function as payable will lower the gas cost for legitimate callers because the compiler will not include checks for whether a payment was provided.
File: src/LiquidationRouter.sol 68 ) external onlyTrustedLiquidationPair(_liquidationPair) returns (uint256) {
File: src/VaultBooster.sol 142 function setBoost(IERC20 _token, address _liquidationPair, UD2x18 _multiplierOfTotalSupplyPerSecond, uint96 _tokensPerSecond, uint144 _initialAvailable) external onlyOwner { 188 function withdraw(IERC20 _token, uint256 _amount) external onlyOwner { 217 ) external override onlyPrizeToken(_tokenIn) onlyLiquidationPair(_tokenOut) returns (bool) { 242 function targetOf(address _tokenIn) external view override onlyPrizeToken(_tokenIn) returns (address) {
When you specify a data location as memory, that value will be copied into memory. When you specify the location as calldata, the value will stay static within calldata. If the value is a large, complex type, using memory may result in extra memory expansion costs.
File: src/libraries/RewardLib.sol 59 AuctionResult[] memory _auctionResults,
If the functions are required by an interface, the contract should inherit from that interface and use the override keyword.
File: src/abstract/RngAuctionRelayer.sol 31 function encodeCalldata(address rewardRecipient) internal returns (bytes memory) {
By using assembly to write to address storage values, you can bypass some of these operations and lower the gas cost of writing to storage. Assembly code allows you to directly access the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) and perform low-level operations that are not possible in Solidity.
example of using assembly to write to address storage values:
contract MyContract { address private myAddress; function setAddressUsingAssembly(address newAddress) public { assembly { sstore(0, newAddress) } } }
File: src/LiquidationPair.sol 106 tokenIn = _tokenIn; 107 tokenOut = _tokenOut;
File: src/RngRelayAuction.sol 116 rngAuctionRelayer = _rngAuctionRelayer;
File: src/VaultBooster.sol 125 vault = _vault;
File: src/RemoteOwner.sol 106 _originChainOwner = _newOriginChainOwner;
Missing checks for zero-addresses may lead to infunctional protocol, if the variable addresses are updated incorrectly. It also wast gas as it requires the redeployment of the contract.
File: src/LiquidationPair.sol 95 address _tokenIn, 96 address _tokenOut,
File: src/RngAuction.sol 142 address owner_,
File: src/VaultBooster.sol 119 PrizePool _prizePool, 120 address _vault, 121 address _owner 123 prizePool = _prizePool;
File: src/RemoteOwner.sol 53 address executor_, 54 address __originChainOwner
Due to how constant variables are implemented (replacements at compile-time), an expression assigned to a constant variable is recomputed each time that the variable is used, which wastes some gas
File:src/libraries/ContinuousGDA.sol 14 SD59x18 internal constant ONE = SD59x18.wrap(1e18);
Arrays are useful when you need to maintain an ordered list of data that can be iterated over, but they have a higher gas cost for read and write operations, especially when the size of the array is large. This is because Solidity needs to iterate over the entire array to perform certain operations, such as finding a specific element or deleting an element.
Mappings, on the other hand, are useful when you need to store and access data based on a key, rather than an index. Mappings have a lower gas cost for read and write operations, especially when the size of the mapping is large, since Solidity can perform these operations based on the key directly, without needing to iterate over the entire data structure.
File: src/LiquidationPairFactory.sol 43 LiquidationPair[] public allPairs;
Prior to 0.8.10 the compiler inserted extra code, including EXTCODESIZE (100 gas), to check for contract existence for external function calls. In more recent solidity versions, the compiler will not insert these checks if the external call has a return value. Similar behavior can be achieved in earlier versions by using low-level calls, since low level calls never check for contract existence.
File: src/LiquidationPair.sol 141 return source.targetOf(tokenIn);
File: src/LiquidationRouter.sol 69 IERC20(_liquidationPair.tokenIn()).safeTransferFrom(
File: src/RngAuction.sol 180 if (IERC20(_feeToken).balanceOf(address(this)) < _requestFee) { 182 IERC20(_feeToken).transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), _requestFee); 185 IERC20(_feeToken).safeIncreaseAllowance(address(rng), _requestFee);
File: src/VaultBooster.sol 226 IERC20(_tokenOut).safeTransfer(_account, _amountOut);
If the variable is only accessed once, it's cheaper to use the state variable directly that one time, and save the 3 gas the extra stack assignment would spend
File: src/libraries/ContinuousGDA.sol 14 SD59x18 internal constant ONE = SD59x18.wrap(1e18);
When you declare a variable inside a loop, Solidity creates a new instance of the variable for each iteration of the loop. This can lead to unnecessary gas costs, especially if the loop is executed frequently or iterates over a large number of elements.
By declaring the variable outside the loop, you can avoid the creation of multiple instances of the variable and reduce the gas cost of your contract. Here's an example:
contract MyContract { function sum(uint256[] memory values) public pure returns (uint256) { uint256 total = 0; for (uint256 i = 0; i < values.length; i++) { total += values[i]; } return total; } }
File: src/RngRelayAuction.sol 168 uint104 _reward = uint104(_rewards[i]);
The compiler uses opcodes GT and ISZERO for solidity code that uses >, but only requires LT for >=, which saves 3 gas
File: src/RngRelayAuction.sol 113 if (auctionTargetTime_ > auctionDurationSeconds_) { 140 if (_auctionElapsedSeconds > (_auctionDurationSeconds-1)) revert AuctionExpired(); 169 if (_reward > 0) {
File: src/libraries/ContinuousGDA.sol 38 if (_emissionRate.unwrap() > 1e18) {
File: src/LiquidationPair.sol 114 if (_decayConstant.mul(period59).unwrap() > uEXP_MAX_INPUT) { 218 if (swapAmountIn > _amountInMax) { 302 if (_amountOut > maxOut) { 332 if (_amountInForPeriod > 0 && _amountOutForPeriod > 0) {
File: src/RngAuction.sol 149 if (auctionTargetTime_ > auctionDurationSeconds_) revert AuctionTargetTimeExceedsDuration(uint64(auctionTargetTime_), uint64(auctionDurationSeconds_)); 176 if (_auctionElapsedTimeSeconds > auctionDuration) revert AuctionExpired(); 179 if (_feeToken != address(0) && _requestFee > 0) {
If the if statement has a logical AND and is not followed by an else statement, it can be replaced with 2 if statements.
contract NestedIfTest { //Execution cost: 22334 gas function funcBad(uint256 input) public pure returns (string memory) { if (input<10 && input>0 && input!=6){ return "If condition passed"; } } //Execution cost: 22294 gas function funcGood(uint256 input) public pure returns (string memory) { if (input<10) { if (input>0){ if (input!=6){ return "If condition passed"; } } } } }
File: src/LiquidationPair.sol 332 if (_amountInForPeriod > 0 && _amountOutForPeriod > 0) {
File: src/RngAuction.sol 179 if (_feeToken != address(0) && _requestFee > 0) {
Each slot saved can avoid an extra Gsset (20000 gas) for the first setting of the struct. Subsequent reads as well as writes have smaller gas savings.
File: src/VaultBooster.sol struct Boost { address liquidationPair; UD2x18 multiplierOfTotalSupplyPerSecond; uint96 tokensPerSecond; uint144 available; uint48 lastAccruedAt; }
File: src/RngAuction.sol struct RngAuctionResult { address recipient; UD2x18 rewardFraction; uint32 sequenceId; RNGInterface rng; uint32 rngRequestId; }
ternary operations can be more gas-efficient than if-else statements. This is because ternary operations are often more concise and can be optimized by the compiler to generate more efficient bytecode.
File: src/abstract/AddressRemapper.sol if (_destinationAddress[_addr] == address(0)) { return _addr; } else { return _destinationAddress[_addr]; }
File: src/libraries/ContinuousGDA.sol if (_emissionRate.unwrap() > 1e18) { result = _k.div(_emissionRate).mul(topE).div(bottomE); } else { result = _k.mul(topE.div(_emissionRate.mul(bottomE))); }
it can be more gas-efficient to use a hardcoded address instead of the address(this) expression, especially if you need to use the same address multiple times in your contract.
The reason for this is that using address(this) requires an additional EXTCODESIZE operation to retrieve the contract's address from its bytecode, which can increase the gas cost of your contract. By pre-calculating and using a hardcoded address, you can avoid this additional operation and reduce the overall gas cost of your contract.
Here's an example of how you can use a hardcoded address instead of address(this):
contract MyContract { address public myAddress = 0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890; #L function doSomething() public { // Use myAddress instead of address(this) require(msg.sender == myAddress, "Caller is not authorized"); // Do something } }
In the above example, we have a contract MyContract with a public address variable myAddress. Instead of using address(this) to retrieve the contract's address, we have pre-calculated and hardcoded the address in the variable. This can help to reduce the gas cost of our contract and make our code more efficient.
File: src/VaultBooster.sol 144 uint256 balance = _token.balanceOf(address(this)); 173 _token.safeTransferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), _amount); 190 uint256 availableBalance = _token.balanceOf(address(this)); 276 uint256 availableBalance = _tokenOut.balanceOf(address(this));
File: src/LiquidationPair.sol 378 uint256 _timestamp = block.timestamp;
#0 - c4-judge
2023-08-14T11:18:23Z
HickupHH3 marked the issue as grade-b