Platform: Code4rena
Start Date: 25/10/2022
Pot Size: $50,000 USDC
Total HM: 18
Participants: 127
Period: 5 days
Judge: 0xean
Total Solo HM: 9
Id: 175
League: ETH
Rank: 73/127
Findings: 1
Award: $36.73
🌟 Selected for report: 0
🚀 Solo Findings: 0
🌟 Selected for report: 0x1f8b
Also found by: 0xNazgul, 0xSmartContract, Aymen0909, B2, Bnke0x0, Deivitto, Diana, Dinesh11G, ElKu, JC, Josiah, Rahoz, RaymondFam, ReyAdmirado, Rolezn, Waze, __141345__, adriro, aphak5010, brgltd, c3phas, c7e7eff, carlitox477, cducrest, ch0bu, chrisdior4, cryptonue, cryptostellar5, cylzxje, d3e4, delfin454000, enckrish, evmwanderer, fatherOfBlocks, gogo, hansfriese, horsefacts, immeas, leosathya, lukris02, neumo, oyc_109, pedr02b2, rbserver, robee, rotcivegaf, rvierdiiev, sakshamguruji, shark, simon135, tnevler, trustindistrust, wagmi
36.7345 USDC - $36.73
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Market.sol#L38-L40 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/DBR.sol#L15 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/BorrowController.sol#L10 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Oracle.sol#L23 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Fed.sol#L30-L32 the variable state can't be initialize by constructor due to missing immutable tag. the constructor parameter mention some variables state to initialize the value. so i suggest to add immutable to the variables .
https://github.com/jbx-protocol/juice-nft-https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Market.sol#L61 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/DBR.sol#L34 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/BorrowController.sol#L13 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Fed.sol#L36
Checking addresses against zero-address during initialization in constructor is a security best-practice. However, such checks are missing in multiple constructors.
 Allowing zero-addresses will lead to contract reverts and force redeployments if there are no setters for such address variables. So we recommend to Add zero-address checks in the constructors.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Market.sol#L118 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Market.sol#L124 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Market.sol#L130 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Market.sol#L136 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Market.sol#L142 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/DBR.sol#L53
to avoid zero address in parameter input. we suggest to add zero check address to the function.
event is missing indexed fields in important parameter. we recommend indexed at important field for increase creadibility.
tx.origin is a global variable in Solidity which returns the address of the account that sent the transaction. Using the variable for authorization could make a contract vulnerable if an authorized account calls into a malicious contract. A call could be made to the vulnerable contract that passes the authorization check since tx.origin returns the original sender of the transaction which in this case is the authorized account. so we suggest tx.origin should not be used for authorization. Use msg.sender instead.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Oracle.sol#L74-L76 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Oracle.sol#L108-L110
the file has a natspec comment to explain utility about function or parameter. but in these file the natspec comment incomplete. So we recommend to complete the natspec comment to increase readability and make it easier when there is an audit.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Market.sol#L74-L76 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Market.sol#L150 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Oracle.sol#L23
when variable Constant should be defined rather than using magic number.
remove all unused code before deploy to increase credibility
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Market.sol#L2 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/DBR.sol#L2 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Oracle.sol#L2 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/BorrowController.sol#L2 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/Fed.sol#L2 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/escrows/GovTokenEscrow.sol#L2 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-inverse/blob/3e81f0f5908ea99b36e6ab72f13488bbfe622183/src/escrows/SimpleERC20Escrow.sol#L2
In the contracts, floating pragmas should not be used. Contracts should be deployed with the same compiler version and flags that they have been tested with thoroughly. Locking the pragma helps to ensure that contracts do not accidentally get deployed using, for example, an outdated compiler version that might introduce bugs that affect the contract system negatively. We suggest to recheck your file and update the pragma.
#0 - c4-judge
2022-11-07T21:53:31Z
0xean marked the issue as grade-b