Platform: Code4rena
Start Date: 13/05/2022
Pot Size: $30,000 USDC
Total HM: 8
Participants: 65
Period: 3 days
Judge: hickuphh3
Total Solo HM: 1
Id: 125
League: ETH
Rank: 24/65
Findings: 2
Award: $93.84
🌟 Selected for report: 0
🚀 Solo Findings: 0
🌟 Selected for report: IllIllI
Also found by: 0x1f8b, 0x4non, 0xNazgul, 0xf15ers, 0xkatana, 0xliumin, AlleyCat, BouSalman, Dravee, Funen, GimelSec, Hawkeye, MaratCerby, Picodes, StErMi, TerrierLover, WatchPug, Waze, berndartmueller, bobirichman, cryptphi, csanuragjain, defsec, delfin454000, dipp, fatherOfBlocks, hake, hickuphh3, hyh, joestakey, kebabsec, mics, mtz, oyc_109, p4st13r4, p_crypt0, robee, rotcivegaf, sikorico, simon135, sorrynotsorry, tintin
69.478 USDC - $69.48
Severity: Low
Context: GeneralVault.sol#L165-L172
, YieldManager.sol#L64-L67
, YieldManager.sol#L73-L76
, YieldManager.sol#L92-L99
Description: Setter functions are missing checks to validate if the new value being set is the same as the current value already set in the contract. Such checks will showcase mismatches between on-chain and off-chain states.
Recommendation: Add in the additional checks to validate if the new value being set is the same as the current value already set in the contract.
Severity: Low
Context: YieldManager.sol#L64-L67
, YieldManager.sol#L73-L76
, YieldManager.sol#L92-L99
Description:
Some onlyOwner
functions that change critical protocol addresses/parameters appear to have a time lock for a time-delayed change to alert: (1) users and give them a chance to engage/exit protocol if they are not agreeable to the changes (2) team in case of compromised owner(s) and given them a chance to perform incident response.
Recommendation: Add a time lock to these functions for a time-delayed change to alert users and protect against possible malicious changes by compromised owners(s).
Severity: Low
Context: GeneralVault.sol#L61-L63
, ConvexCurveLPVault.sol#L37-L49
, CollateralAdapter.sol#L43-L50
, YieldManager.sol#L73-L76
, YieldManager.sol#L92-L99 (For L93 & L94)
Description: Lack of zero-address validation on address parameters may lead to reverts and force contract redeployments.
Recommendation: Add explicit zero-address validation on input parameters of address type.
Severity: Low
Context: ConvexCurveLPVault.sol#L37-L49
, CollateralAdapter.sol#L43-L50
, YieldManager.sol#L64-L67
, YieldManager.sol#L73-L76
, YieldManager.sol#L92-L99
, YieldManager.sol#L118-L137
,
Description: Several functions update critical parameters that are missing event emission. These should be performed to ensure tracking of changes of such critical parameters.
Recommendation: Add events to functions that change critical parameters.
Severity: Informational
Context: All Contracts
Description: Some functions are missing @notice/@dev NatSpec comments for the function, @param for all/some of their parameters and @return for return values. Given that NatSpec is an important part of code documentation, this affects code comprehension, auditability and usability.
Recommendation: Add in full NatSpec comments for all functions to have complete code documentation for future use.
Severity: Informational
Context: All Contracts
Description: Using very old versions of Solidity prevents benefits of bug fixes and newer security checks. Using the latest versions might make contracts susceptible to undiscovered compiler bugs.
Recommendation:
Consider using a more recent version such as 0.8.4
.
#0 - HickupHH3
2022-06-06T03:06:35Z
Low issues: timelocks NC issues: equivalence checks, zero address validation, event emissions, natspec compatibility, older version pragma Invalid:
🌟 Selected for report: IllIllI
Also found by: 0v3rf10w, 0x1f8b, 0x4non, 0xNazgul, 0xf15ers, 0xkatana, 0xliumin, Cityscape, Dravee, Fitraldys, Funen, GimelSec, Hawkeye, JC, MaratCerby, SooYa, StErMi, Tomio, WatchPug, Waze, bobirichman, defsec, delfin454000, fatherOfBlocks, hake, hansfriese, hickuphh3, ignacio, joestakey, kebabsec, mics, mtz, oyc_109, robee, rotcivegaf, samruna, sikorico, simon135, z3s
24.3601 USDC - $24.36
++index
instead of index++
to increment a loop counterContext: GeneralVault.sol#L204-L233
, ConvexCurveLPVault.sol#L87-L111
, YieldManager.sol#L118-L137 (For both)
, YieldManager.sol#L142-L171
Description:
Due to reduced stack operations, using ++index
saves 5 gas per iteration.
Recommendation:
Use ++index
to increment a loop counter.
Context: YieldManager.sol#L118-L137 (For L130)
Description: One can save gas by caching the array length (in stack) and using that set variable in the loop. Replace state variable reads and writes within loops with local variable reads and writes. This is done by assigning state variable values to new local variables, reading and/or writing the local variables in a loop, then after the loop assigning any changed local variables to their equivalent state variables.
Recommendation:
Simply do something like so before the for loop: uint length = variable.length
. Then add length
in place of variable.length
in the for loop.
require()
, Use != 0
Instead of > 0
With Uint ValuesContext: GeneralVault.sol#L177-L183
, LidoVault.sol#L79-L104 (For L88)
Description:
In a require, when checking a uint, using != 0
instead of > 0
saves 6 gas. This will jump over or avoid an extra ISZERO
opcode.
Recommendation:
Use != 0
instead of > 0
with uint values but only in require()
statements.
Immutable
Context: ConvexCurveLPVault.sol#L27
Description:
Solidity 0.6.5
introduced immutable
as a major feature. It allows setting contract-level variables at construction time which gets stored in code rather than storage. Each call to it reads from storage, using a sload
costing 2100 gas cold or 100 gas warm. Setting it to immutable
will have each storage read of the state variable to be replaced by the instruction push32 value
, where value
is set during contract construction time and this costs only 3 gas.
Recommendation:
Set the state variable to immutable
Context: All Contracts
Description:
Contracts most called functions could simply save gas by function ordering via Method ID. Calling a function at runtime will be cheaper if the function is positioned earlier in the order (has a relatively lower Method ID) because 22 gas are added to the cost of a function for every position that came before it. The caller can save on gas if you prioritize most called functions. One could use This tool
to help find alternative function names with lower Method IDs while keeping the original name intact.
Recommendation:
Find a lower method ID name for the most called functions for example mostCalled()
vs. mostCalled_41q()
is cheaper by 44 gas.
Context: All Contracts
Description: Using newer compiler versions and the optimizer gives gas optimizations and additional safety checks for free!
The advantages of versions =0.8.*= over =<0.8.0= are:
Low level inliner
from =0.8.2=, leads to cheaper runtime gas.
Especially relevant when the contract has small functions. For
example, OpenZeppelin libraries typically have a lot of small
helper functions and if they are not inlined, they cost an
additional 20 to 40 gas because of 2 extra =jump= instructions and
additional stack operations needed for function calls.Optimizer improvements in packed structs
: Before =0.8.3=, storing
packed structs, in some cases used an additional storage read
operation. After EIP-2929
, if the slot was already cold, this
means unnecessary stack operations and extra deploy time costs.
However, if the slot was already warm, this means additional cost
of =100= gas alongside the same unnecessary stack operations and
extra deploy time costs.Custom errors
from =0.8.4=, leads to cheaper deploy time cost and
run time cost. Note: the run time cost is only relevant when the
revert condition is met. In short, replace revert strings by
custom errors.Recommendation: Upgrade to at least 0.8.4 for the additional benefits.