Platform: Code4rena
Start Date: 07/10/2022
Pot Size: $50,000 USDC
Total HM: 4
Participants: 62
Period: 5 days
Judge: 0xean
Total Solo HM: 2
Id: 169
League: ETH
Rank: 14/62
Findings: 2
Award: $321.70
🌟 Selected for report: 0
🚀 Solo Findings: 0
🌟 Selected for report: 0xSmartContract
Also found by: 0x1f8b, 0x4non, 0xNazgul, Bnke0x0, Chom, IllIllI, Josiah, Rahoz, RaymondFam, Trust, Waze, ajtra, bobirichman, brgltd, bulej93, c3phas, cccz, chrisdior4, delfin454000, fatherOfBlocks, gogo, ladboy233, mcwildy, mics, nicobevi, oyc_109, rbserver, rotcivegaf, zzzitron
50.2765 USDC - $50.28
The pragma version used are:
pragma solidity >=0.6.12 <0.8.0; pragma solidity ^0.7.6;
Note that mixing pragma is not recommended. Because different compiler versions have different meanings and behaviors, it also significantly raises maintenance costs. As a result, depending on the compiler version selected for any given file, deployed contracts may have security issues.
The minimum required version must be 0.8.17; otherwise, contracts will be affected by the following important bug fixes:
abi.encodeCall
in place of fixed bytes arguments.calldatasize()
in all cases.bytes
arrays.Apart from these, there are several minor bug fixes and improvements.
address(0)
The following methods have a lack of checks if the received argument is an address, it's good practice in order to reduce human error to check that the address specified in the constructor or initialize is different than address(0)
.
Affected source code:
supportsInterface
The EIP-165 standard helps detect that a smart contract implements the expected logic, prevents human error when configuring smart contract bindings, so it is recommended to check that the received argument is a contract and supports the expected interface.
Reference:
Affected source code:
abstract
for base contractsabstract
contracts are contracts that have at least one function without its implementation. An instance of an abstract cannot be created.
Reference:
Affected source code:
The contract GraphProxy
has the following comment:
NOTE: Only the admin can call this function.
But this is not true, because the following methods use the modifier ifAdminOrPendingImpl
or ifAdmin
, and these modifiers will invoke _fallback
if is not an admin.
Affected source code:
Although not vulnerable, the version of openZeppelin used contains known vulnerabilities.
Reference:
Affected source code:
initialize
twiceThe method initialize
should be allowed to be called only once.
Affected source code:
#0 - trust1995
2022-10-21T22:10:47Z
Point 7 is dup of #149
🌟 Selected for report: IllIllI
Also found by: 0x1f8b, 0xNazgul, 0xSmartContract, 0xdeadbeef, B2, Bnke0x0, Deivitto, ElKu, Jujic, KoKo, Pheonix, RaymondFam, RedOneN, RockingMiles, Rolezn, Saintcode_, Shinchan, TomJ, Tomio, __141345__, ajtra, aysha, c3phas, carlitox477, catchup, delfin454000, emrekocak, erictee, fatherOfBlocks, gerdusx, gianganhnguyen, gogo, martin, mcwildy, medikko, oyc_109, pedr02b2, rbserver, ret2basic, rotcivegaf, saian, sakman, zishansami
271.4225 USDC - $271.42
require
instead of assert
The assert()
and require()
functions are a part of the error handling aspect in Solidity. Solidity makes use of state-reverting error handling exceptions. This means all changes made to the contract on that call or any sub-calls are undone if an error is thrown. It also flags an error.
They are quite similar as both check for conditions and if they are not met, would throw an error.
The big difference between the two is that the assert()
function when false, uses up all the remaining gas and reverts all the changes made.
Meanwhile, a require()
function when false, also reverts back all the changes made to the contract but does refund all the remaining gas fees we offered to pay. This is the most common Solidity function used by developers for debugging and error handling.
Affected source code:
Compare a boolean value using == true
or == false
instead of using the boolean value is more expensive.
NOT
opcode it's cheaper than using EQUAL
or NOTEQUAL
when the value it's false, or just the value without == true
when it's true, because it will use less opcodes inside the VM.
Proof of concept (without optimizations):
pragma solidity 0.8.16; contract TesterA { function testEqual(bool a) public view returns (bool) { return a == true; } } contract TesterB { function testNot(bool a) public view returns (bool) { return a; } }
Gas saving executing: 18 per entry for == true
TesterA.testEqual: 21814 TesterB.testNot: 21796
pragma solidity 0.8.16; contract TesterA { function testEqual(bool a) public view returns (bool) { return a == false; } } contract TesterB { function testNot(bool a) public view returns (bool) { return !a; } }
Gas saving executing: 15 per entry for == false
TesterA.testEqual: 21814 TesterB.testNot: 21799
Affected source code:
Use the value instead of == true
:
Shortening revert strings to fit in 32 bytes will decrease deployment time gas and will decrease runtime gas when the revert condition is met.
Revert strings that are longer than 32 bytes require at least one additional mstore, along with additional overhead for computing memory offset, etc.
Proof of concept (without optimizations):
pragma solidity 0.8.15; contract TesterA { function testShortRevert(bool path) public view { require(path, "test error"); } } contract TesterB { function testLongRevert(bool path) public view { require(path, "test big error message, more than 32 bytes"); } }
Gas saving executing: 18 per entry
TesterA.testShortRevert: 21886 TesterB.testLongRevert: 21904
Affected source code:
Custom errors from Solidity 0.8.4
are cheaper than revert strings (cheaper deployment cost and runtime cost when the revert condition is met)
Source Custom Errors in Solidity:
Starting from Solidity v0.8.4
, there is a convenient and gas-efficient way to explain to users why an operation failed through the use of custom errors. Until now, you could already use strings to give more information about failures (e.g., revert("Insufficient funds.");), but they are rather expensive, especially when it comes to deploy cost, and it is difficult to use dynamic information in them.
Custom errors are defined using the error statement, which can be used inside and outside of contracts (including interfaces and libraries).
Proof of concept (without optimizations):
pragma solidity 0.8.15; contract TesterA { function testRevert(bool path) public view { require(path, "test error"); } } contract TesterB { error MyError(string msg); function testError(bool path) public view { if(path) revert MyError("test error"); } }
Gas saving executing: 9 per entry
TesterA.testRevert: 21611 TesterB.testError: 21602
Affected source code:
delete
optimizationUse delete
instead of set to default value (false
or 0
).
5 gas could be saved per entry in the following affected lines:
Affected source code:
bool
to uint256
can save gasBecause each write operation requires an additional SLOAD
to read the slot's contents, replace the bits occupied by the boolean, and then write back, booleans
are more expensive than uint256
or any other type that uses a complete word. This cannot be turned off because it is the compiler's defense against pointer aliasing and contract upgrades.
Reference:
Also, this is applicable to integer types different from uint256
or int256
.
Affected source code for booleans
:
If a variable is not set/initialized, the default value is assumed (0, false
, 0x0 ... depending on the data type). You are simply wasting gas if you directly initialize it with its default value.
Proof of concept (without optimizations):
pragma solidity 0.8.15; contract TesterA { function testInit() public view returns (uint) { uint a = 0; return a; } } contract TesterB { function testNoInit() public view returns (uint) { uint a; return a; } }
Gas saving executing: 8 per entry
TesterA.testInit: 21392 TesterB.testNoInit: 21384
Affected source code:
immutable
It's possible to avoid storage access a save gas using immutable
keyword for the following variables:
It's also better to remove the initial values, because they will be set during the constructor.
Affected source code:
Governed.transferOwnership
It's possible to save a variable emitting the event before set, like that:
function transferOwnership(address _newGovernor) external onlyGovernor { require(_newGovernor != address(0), "Governor must be set"); + emit NewPendingOwnership(pendingGovernor, _newGovernor); - address oldPendingGovernor = pendingGovernor; pendingGovernor = _newGovernor; - emit NewPendingOwnership(oldPendingGovernor, pendingGovernor); }
Affected source code:
Governed.acceptOwnership
It's possible to save two variables emitting the event before set, like that:
function acceptOwnership() external { require( pendingGovernor != address(0) && msg.sender == pendingGovernor, "Caller must be pending governor" ); - address oldGovernor = governor; - address oldPendingGovernor = pendingGovernor; + emit NewOwnership(pendingGovernor, governor); + emit NewPendingOwnership(oldPendingGovernor, address(0)); governor = pendingGovernor; pendingGovernor = address(0); - emit NewOwnership(oldGovernor, governor); - emit NewPendingOwnership(oldPendingGovernor, pendingGovernor); }
Affected source code:
constants
expressions are expressions, not constants
Due to how constant variables are implemented (replacements at compile-time), an expression assigned to a constant variable is recomputed each time that the variable is used, which wastes some gas.
If the variable was immutable instead: the calculation would only be done once at deploy time (in the constructor), and then the result would be saved and read directly at runtime rather than being recalculated.
Reference:
Consequences: each usage of a "constant" costs ~100gas more on each access (it is still a little better than storing the result in storage, but not much..). since these are not real constants, they can't be referenced from a real constant environment (e.g. from assembly, or from another library).
Affected source code:
GraphTokenUpgradeable.permit
It's possible to save a method call like that:
function permit( address _owner, address _spender, uint256 _value, uint256 _deadline, uint8 _v, bytes32 _r, bytes32 _s ) external { bytes32 digest = keccak256( abi.encodePacked( "\x19\x01", DOMAIN_SEPARATOR, keccak256( abi.encode(PERMIT_TYPEHASH, _owner, _spender, _value, nonces[_owner], _deadline) ) ) ); address recoveredAddress = ECDSA.recover(digest, _v, _r, _s); require(_owner == recoveredAddress, "GRT: invalid permit"); require(_deadline == 0 || block.timestamp <= _deadline, "GRT: expired permit"); - nonces[_owner] = nonces[_owner].add(1); + nonces[_owner] = nonces[_owner] + 1; _approve(_owner, _spender, _value); }
Affected source code:
#0 - tmigone
2022-10-21T20:07:07Z
We've found this submission to be of high quality.