Platform: Code4rena
Start Date: 07/10/2022
Pot Size: $50,000 USDC
Total HM: 4
Participants: 62
Period: 5 days
Judge: 0xean
Total Solo HM: 2
Id: 169
League: ETH
Rank: 53/62
Findings: 1
Award: $20.79
🌟 Selected for report: 0
🚀 Solo Findings: 0
🌟 Selected for report: IllIllI
Also found by: 0x1f8b, 0xNazgul, 0xSmartContract, 0xdeadbeef, B2, Bnke0x0, Deivitto, ElKu, Jujic, KoKo, Pheonix, RaymondFam, RedOneN, RockingMiles, Rolezn, Saintcode_, Shinchan, TomJ, Tomio, __141345__, ajtra, aysha, c3phas, carlitox477, catchup, delfin454000, emrekocak, erictee, fatherOfBlocks, gerdusx, gianganhnguyen, gogo, martin, mcwildy, medikko, oyc_109, pedr02b2, rbserver, ret2basic, rotcivegaf, saian, sakman, zishansami
20.7905 USDC - $20.79
Boolean variables can be checked within conditionals directly without the use of equality operators to true/false.
GNS.sol, 717: require(legacySubgraphExists == true, "GNS: Subgraph does not exist"); GNS.sol, 818: require(_isPublished(subgraphData) == true, "GNS: Must be active"); GNS.sol, 506: require(subgraphData.disabled == true, "GNS: Must be disabled first"); Staking.sol, 202: return msg.sender == _indexer || isOperator(msg.sender, _indexer) == true; ServiceRegistry.sol, 27: return msg.sender == _indexer || staking().isOperator(msg.sender, _indexer) == true; GNS.sol, 804: return _subgraphData.subgraphDeploymentID != 0 && _subgraphData.disabled == false; L1GraphTokenGateway.sol, 214: extraData.length == 0 || callhookWhitelist[msg.sender] == true, Staking.sol, 970: require(assetHolders[msg.sender] == true, "!assetHolder");
Unused state variables are gas consuming at deployment (since they are located in storage) and are a bad code practice. Removing those variables will decrease deployment gas cost and improve code quality. This is a full list of all the unused storage variables we found in your code base.
DisputeManagerStorage.sol, fishermanRewardPercentage L2ArbitrumMessenger.sol, ARB_SYS_ADDRESS EpochManagerStorage.sol, epochLength GNSStorage.sol, subgraphNFT RewardsManagerStorage.sol, tokenSupplySnapshot GraphGovernanceStorage.sol, proposals
There are places in the code (especially in for-each loops) that loads the same array element more than once. In such cases, only one array boundaries check should take place, and the rest are unnecessary. Therefore, this array element should be cached in a local variable and then be loaded again using this local variable, skipping the redundant second array boundaries check:
Staking.sol.closeAllocationMany - double load of _requests[i]
Caching the array length is more gas efficient. This is because access to a local variable in solidity is more efficient than query storage / calldata / memory. We recommend to change from:
for (uint256 i=0; i<array.length; i++) { ... }
to:
uint len = array.length for (uint256 i=0; i<len; i++) { ... }
Multicall.sol, data, 19 Base58Encoder.sol, source, 18 Base58Encoder.sol, indices, 53 Staking.sol, _requests, 924 RewardsManager.sol, _subgraphDeploymentID, 161 AllocationExchange.sol, _vouchers, 136 Base58Encoder.sol, input, 45 Staking.sol, _allocationID, 1050
Prefix increments are cheaper than postfix increments.
Further more, using unchecked {++x} is even more gas efficient, and the gas saving accumulates every iteration and can make a real change
There is no risk of overflow caused by increamenting the iteration index in for loops (the ++i
in for (uint256 i = 0; i < numIterations; ++i)
).
But increments perform overflow checks that are not necessary in this case.
These functions use not using prefix increments (++x
) or not using the unchecked keyword:
change to prefix increment and unchecked: RewardsManager.sol, i, 161 change to prefix increment and unchecked: Base58Encoder.sol, i, 53 change to prefix increment and unchecked: Staking.sol, i, 924 change to prefix increment and unchecked: Base58Encoder.sol, i, 37 change to prefix increment and unchecked: AllocationExchange.sol, i, 136 change to prefix increment and unchecked: Multicall.sol, i, 19 change to prefix increment and unchecked: Base58Encoder.sol, i, 45 change to prefix increment and unchecked: Staking.sol, i, 1050 just change to unchecked: Base58Encoder.sol, i, 18
In for loops you initialize the index to start from 0, but it already initialized to 0 in default and this assignment cost gas. It is more clear and gas efficient to declare without assigning 0 and will have the same meaning:
AllocationExchange.sol, 136 Staking.sol, 924 Base58Encoder.sol, 37 Base58Encoder.sol, 18 Multicall.sol, 19 Staking.sol, 1050 Base58Encoder.sol, 45 Base58Encoder.sol, 53 RewardsManager.sol, 161
Reading a storage variable is gas costly (SLOAD). In cases of multiple read of a storage variable in the same scope, caching the first read (i.e saving as a local variable) can save gas and decrease the overall gas uses. The following is a list of functions and the storage variables that you read twice:
Staking.sol: MAX_PPM is read twice in _setDelegationParameters Staking.sol: MAX_PPM is read twice in _stake GNS.sol: MAX_PPM is read twice in _setOwnerTaxPercentage LibFixedMath.sol: FIXED_1 is read twice in ln
Unnecessary default assignments, you can just declare and it will save gas and have the same meaning.
LibFixedMath.sol (L#41) : int256 private constant EXP_MAX_VAL = 0;
You can change the order of the storage variables to decrease memory uses.
In Pausable.sol,rearranging the storage fields can optimize to: 3 slots from: 4 slots. The new order of types (you choose the actual variables): 1. uint256 2. uint256 3. address 4. bool 5. bool
In BancorFormula.sol,rearranging the storage fields can optimize to: 9 slots from: 10 slots. The new order of types (you choose the actual variables): 1. uint256 2. uint256 3. uint256 4. uint256 5. uint256 6. uint256 7. uint256 8. uint256 9. uint32 10. uint16 11. uint8 12. uint8
In DisputeManagerStorage.sol,rearranging the storage fields can optimize to: 3 slots from: 4 slots. The new order of types (you choose the actual variables): 1. bytes32 2. uint256 3. address 4. uint32 5. uint32 6. uint32
Use bytes32 instead of string to save gas whenever possible. String is a dynamic data structure and therefore is more gas consuming then bytes32.
SubgraphNFT.sol (L153), string memory _subgraphURI = metadata > 0 ? HexStrings.toString(metadata) : "";
The following require messages are of length more than 32 and we think are short enough to short them into exactly 32 characters such that it will be placed in one slot of memory and the require function will cost less gas. The list:
Solidity file: Curation.sol, In line 195, Require message length to shorten: 35, The message: Caller must be the staking contract Solidity file: RewardsManager.sol, In line 95, Require message length to shorten: 35, The message: Issuance rate under minimum allowed Solidity file: GRTWithdrawHelper.sol, In line 63, Require message length to shorten: 33, The message: GRTWithdrawHelper: !returnAddress Solidity file: GNS.sol, In line 194, Require message length to shorten: 33, The message: Owner tax must be MAX_PPM or less Solidity file: GraphProxy.sol, In line 141, Require message length to shorten: 33, The message: Implementation must be a contract Solidity file: EthereumDIDRegistry.sol, In line 60, Require message length to shorten: 33, The message: Signer must be the identity owner
Using != 0 is slightly cheaper than > 0. (see https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-12-maple-findings/issues/75 for similar issue)
BancorFormula.sol, 194: change '_reserveRatio > 0' to '_reserveRatio != 0' BancorFormula.sol, 289: change '_toReserveRatio > 0' to '_toReserveRatio != 0' LibFixedMath.sol, 404: change 'b > 0' to 'b != 0' BancorFormula.sol, 234: change '_supply > 0' to '_supply != 0' Staking.sol, 1119: change '_tokens > 0' to '_tokens != 0' BancorFormula.sol, 285: change '_fromReserveBalance > 0' to '_fromReserveBalance != 0'
DisputeType DisputeManager.sol._slashIndexer - unnecessary casting DisputeType(_disputeType) uint256 Staking.sol._collectCurationFees - unnecessary casting uint256(_curationPercentage) uint256 Staking.sol._collectTax - unnecessary casting uint256(_percentage)
You can use unchecked in the following calculations since there is no risk to overflow:
EthereumDIDRegistry.sol (L#235) - emit DIDAttributeChanged( identity, name, value, block.timestamp + validity, changed[identity] ); EthereumDIDRegistry.sol (L#118) - delegates[identity][keccak256(abi.encode(delegateType))][delegate] = block.timestamp + validity; EthereumDIDRegistry.sol (L#126) - block.timestamp + validity, changed[identity] );
You can inline the following functions instead of writing a specific function to save gas. (see https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-11-nested-findings/issues/167 for a similar issue.)
LibFixedMath.sol, toInteger, { return f / FIXED_1; } MathUtils.sol, min, { return x <= y ? x : y; } MathUtils.sol, diffOrZero, { return (x > y) ? x.sub(y) : 0; } DisputeManager.sol, _isDisputeInConflict, { return _dispute.relatedDisputeID != 0; }
The following functions are used exactly once. Therefore you can inline them and save gas and improve code clearness.
BancorFormula.sol, floorLog2 RewardsManager.sol, _pow Stakes.sol, tokensWithdrawable GNS.sol, _chargeOwnerTax GraphTokenUpgradeable.sol, _getChainID Base58Encoder.sol, reverse Base58Encoder.sol, toAlphabet GNS.sol, _nextAccountSeqID Stakes.sol, allocate DisputeManager.sol, _slashIndexer DisputeManager.sol, _onlyArbitrator DisputeManager.sol, _getSlashingPercentageForDisputeType GraphUpgradeable.sol, _implementation BancorFormula.sol, findPositionInMaxExpArray SubgraphNFT.sol, _setMinter Staking.sol, _getEffectiveAllocation GraphProxyStorage.sol, _pendingImplementation Staking.sol, _undelegate GNS.sol, _nextSubgraphID Base58Encoder.sol, truncate Curation.sol, _tokensToSignal HexStrings.sol, toHexString DisputeManager.sol, _toUint8 Staking.sol, _collectCurationFees Staking.sol, _collectDelegationIndexingRewards Managed.sol, _onlyController BancorFormula.sol, generalExp Stakes.sol, unlockTokens Staking.sol, _distributeRewards Stakes.sol, tokensUsed Stakes.sol, tokensAvailableWithDelegation L1GraphTokenGateway.sol, parseOutboundData BancorFormula.sol, optimalExp DisputeManager.sol, _createIndexingDisputeWithAllocation SubgraphNFT.sol, _setTokenDescriptor Staking.sol, _collectDelegationQueryRewards Managed.sol, _notPartialPaused Managed.sol, _notPaused DisputeManager.sol, _getChainID L2GraphTokenGateway.sol, parseOutboundData BancorFormula.sol, optimalLog Rebates.sol, unclaimedFees GraphProxyStorage.sol, _implementation BancorFormula.sol, generalLog Stakes.sol, release GNS.sol, _burnNFT GraphTokenUpgradeable.sol, _initialize RewardsManager.sol, _setIssuanceRate GraphToken.sol, _getChainID Managed.sol, _onlyGovernor DisputeManager.sol, _recoverAttestationSigner
Change if -> revert pattern to 'require' to save gas and improve code quality, if (some_condition) { revert(revert_message) }
to: require(!some_condition, revert_message)
In the following locations:
LibFixedMath.sol, 140 LibFixedMath.sol, 153 LibFixedMath.sol, 59 LibFixedMath.sol, 386 LibFixedMath.sol, 156 LibFixedMath.sol, 88 LibFixedMath.sol, 396 LibFixedMath.sol, 405 LibFixedMath.sol, 100 LibFixedMath.sol, 267 LibFixedMath.sol, 137 LibFixedMath.sol, 393
Using newer compiler versions and the optimizer gives gas optimizations and additional safety checks are available for free.
The advantages of versions 0.8.* over <0.8.0 are:
1. Safemath by default from 0.8.0 (can be more gas efficient than library based safemath.) 2. Low level inliner : from 0.8.2, leads to cheaper runtime gas. Especially relevant when the contract has small functions. For example, OpenZeppelin libraries typically have a lot of small helper functions and if they are not inlined, they cost an additional 20 to 40 gas because of 2 extra jump instructions and additional stack operations needed for function calls. 3. Optimizer improvements in packed structs: Before 0.8.3, storing packed structs, in some cases used an additional storage read operation. After EIP-2929, if the slot was already cold, this means unnecessary stack operations and extra deploy time costs. However, if the slot was already warm, this means additional cost of 100 gas alongside the same unnecessary stack operations and extra deploy time costs. 4. Custom errors from 0.8.4, leads to cheaper deploy time cost and run time cost. Note: the run time cost is only relevant when the revert condition is met. In short, replace revert strings by custom errors.
Managed.sol TokenUtils.sol IServiceRegistry.sol IRewardsManager.sol ISubgraphNFT.sol
We recommend not to cache msg.sender since calling it is 2 gas while reading a variable is more.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-thegraph/tree/main/contracts/discovery/GNS.sol#L325 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-thegraph/tree/main/contracts/disputes/DisputeManager.sol#L403 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-thegraph/tree/main/contracts/staking/Staking.sol#L825 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-thegraph/tree/main/contracts/discovery/GNS.sol#L445