Platform: Code4rena
Start Date: 08/06/2022
Pot Size: $115,000 USDC
Total HM: 26
Participants: 72
Period: 11 days
Judge: leastwood
Total Solo HM: 14
Id: 132
League: ETH
Rank: 43/72
Findings: 2
Award: $226.92
🌟 Selected for report: 0
🚀 Solo Findings: 0
🌟 Selected for report: BowTiedWardens
Also found by: 0x1f8b, 0x29A, 0x52, 0xNazgul, 0xNineDec, 0xf15ers, 0xkatana, 0xmint, Chom, ElKu, Funen, IllIllI, JMukesh, Jujic, Kaiziron, Lambda, MiloTruck, Ruhum, SmartSek, SooYa, TerrierLover, TomJ, WatchPug, Waze, _Adam, asutorufos, auditor0517, bardamu, c3phas, catchup, cccz, ch13fd357r0y3r, cloudjunky, cmichel, cryptphi, csanuragjain, defsec, fatherOfBlocks, hansfriese, hyh, jayjonah8, joestakey, k, kenta, obtarian, oyc_109, robee, sach1r0, shenwilly, simon135, slywaters, sorrynotsorry, tintin, unforgiven, xiaoming90, zzzitron
142.2658 USDC - $142.27
Severity: Low
Context: PortalFacet.sol#L57-L69
, ConnextPriceOracle.sol#L142-L180
Description: Setter functions are missing checks to validate if the new value being set is the same as the current value already set in the contract. Such checks will showcase mismatches between on-chain and off-chain states.
Recommendation: Add in the additional checks to validate if the new value being set is the same as the current value already set in the contract.
Severity: Low
Context: PortalFacet.sol#L57-L69
Description: None of the onlyOwner functions that change critical protocol addresses/parameters appear to have a timelock for a time-delayed change to alert: (1) users and give them a chance to engage/exit protocol if they are not agreeable to the changes (2) team in case of compromised owner(s) and given them a chance to perform incident response.
Recommendation: Add a timelock to these functions for a time-delayed change to alert users and protect against possible malicious changes by compromised owners(s).
Severity: Low
Context: PortalFacet.sol#L57-L69
Description: Several functions update critical parameters that are missing event emission. These should be performed to ensure tracking of changes of such critical parameters.
Recommendation: Add events to functions that change critical parameters.
SafeMath.sol
Severity Informational
Context: ConnextPriceoracle.sol
, AmplificationUtils.sol
, SwapUtils.sol
Description: Since Solidity 0.8, the overflow/underflow check is implemented on the language level - it adds the validation to the bytecode during compilation.
You don't need the SafeMath
library for Solidity 0.8+
. It will just perform the same validation twice (one on the language level and one in the library).
Recommendation:
Remove the use of SafeMath
library.
Severity Informational
Context: AssetFacet.sol#L22-L62
, BridgeFacet.sol#L179-L195
, RoutersFacet.sol#L98-L124
, ConnextPriceOracle.sol#L65-L69
, SponsorVault.sol#L70-L113
Description: Parameters of certain events are expected to be indexed so that they’re included in the block’s bloom filter for faster access. Failure to do so might confuse off-chain tooling looking for such indexed events.
Recommendation: Add the indexed keyword to event parameters that should include it.
Severity: Informational
Context: BridgeFacet.sol#L492
, BridgeFacet.sol#L579
, BridgeFacet.sol#L594
, BridgeFacet.sol#L1027
, Executor.sol#L7
, LibConnextStorage.sol#L303
Description: There should never be any TODOs in the code when deploying.
Recommendation: Finish the TODOs before deploying.
Severity: Informational
Context: BridgeFacet.sol#L86 (crosschain => cross chain)
, BridgeFacet.sol#L105 (crosschain => cross chain)
, BridgeFacet.sol#L125 (crosschain => cross chain)
, BridgeFacet.sol#L134 (crosschain => cross chain)
, BridgeFacet.sol#L148 (crosschain => cross chain)
, BridgeFacet.sol#L265 (bridgable => bridgeable)
, BridgeFacet.sol#L450-L451 (asseted => asset?)
, BridgeFacet.sol#L774 (addressess => addresses)
, BridgeFacet.sol#L1059 (a sthe => as the)
, ProposedOwnableFacet.sol#L143 (sournce => source)
, ProposedOwnableFacet.sol#L163 (sournce => source)
, ProposedOwnableFacet.sol#L176 (sournce => source)
, RelayerFacet.sol#L35 (rlayer => relayer)
, RoutersFacet.sol#L290 (crosschain => cross chain)
, RoutersFacet.sol#L575 (specicfied => specified)
, Executor.sol#L17 (callabale => callable)
, LPToken.sol#L41 (everytime => every time)
, ProposedOwnableUpgradeable.sol#L170 (sournce => source)
, ProposedOwnableUpgradeable.sol#L198 (sournce => source)
, ProposedOwnableUpgradeable.sol#L212 (sournce => source)
, PromiseRouter.sol#L50 (incomming => incoming)
, PromiseRouter.sol#L266 (crosschain=> cross chain)
, PromiseRouter.sol#L278 (crosschain=> cross chain)
, LibConnextStorage.sol#L23 (crosschain=> cross chain)
, LibConnextStorage.sol#L26 (crosschain=> cross chain)
, LibConnextStorage.sol#L278 (briding => bribing)
, LibCrossDomainProperty.sol#L35 (identifer => identifier)
Description: Spelling errors in comments can cause confusion to both users and developers.
Recommendation: Check all misspellings to ensure they are corrected.
Severity Informational
Context: All Contracts
Description: Using too recent of a pragma is risky since they are not battle tested. A rise of a bug that wasn't known on release would cause either a hack or a need to secure funds and redeploy.
Recommendation:
Use a Pragma version that has been used for sometime. I would suggest 0.8.4
for the decrease of risk and still has the gas optimizations implemented.
🌟 Selected for report: IllIllI
Also found by: 0x1f8b, 0x29A, 0xKitsune, 0xNazgul, 0xf15ers, 0xkatana, 0xmint, BowTiedWardens, ElKu, Fitraldys, Funen, Kaiziron, Lambda, Metatron, MiloTruck, Randyyy, Ruhum, SmartSek, TomJ, Tomio, UnusualTurtle, Waze, _Adam, apostle0x01, asutorufos, c3phas, catchup, csanuragjain, defsec, fatherOfBlocks, hansfriese, hyh, ignacio, joestakey, k, kaden, nahnah, oyc_109, rfa, robee, sach1r0, simon135, slywaters
84.6501 USDC - $84.65
++index
instead of index++
to increment a loop counterContext: DiamondLoupeFacet.sol#L27-L36
, StableSwapFacet.sol#L393-L454
, ConnextPriceOracle.sol#L175-L180
, StableSwap.sol#L61-L93
, LibDiamond.sol#L95-L118
, LibDiamond.sol#L120-L136
, LibDiamond.sol#L138-L155
, LibDiamond.sol#L157-L167
, SwapUtils.sol#L173-L221
, SwapUtils.sol#L241-L276 (For both)
, SwapUtils.sol#L286-L321 (For all three)
, SwapUtils.sol#L336-L348
, SwapUtils.sol#L388-L433 (For both)
, SwapUtils.sol#L549-L562
, SwapUtils.sol#L581-L606
, SwapUtils.sol#L817-L898 (For both)
, SwapUtils.sol#L909-L935
, SwapUtils.sol#L986-L1046 (For all three)
, SwapUtils.sol#L1053-L1062
,
Description:
Due to reduced stack operations, using ++index
saves 5 gas per iteration.
Recommendation:
Use ++index
to increment a loop counter.
Context: RelayerFacet.sol#L130-L152
, StableSwapFacet.sol#L393-L454
, ConnextPriceOracle.sol#L175-L180
, StableSwap.sol#L61-L93
, LibDiamond.sol#L95-L118
, LibDiamond.sol#L120-L136
, LibDiamond.sol#L138-L155
, LibDiamond.sol#L157-L167
, SwapUtils.sol#L173-L221
, SwapUtils.sol#L549-L562
, SwapUtils.sol#L581-L606
, SwapUtils.sol#L817-L898 (For both)
, SwapUtils.sol#L909-L935
, SwapUtils.sol#L986-L1046 (For all three)
, SwapUtils.sol#L1053-L1062
Description: One can save gas by caching the array length (in stack) and using that set variable in the loop. Replace state variable reads and writes within loops with local variable reads and writes. This is done by assigning state variable values to new local variables, reading and/or writing the local variables in a loop, then after the loop assigning any changed local variables to their equivalent state variables.
Recommendation:
Simply do something like so before the for loop: uint length = variable.length
. Then add length
in place of variable.length
in the for loop.
Context: DiamondLoupeFacet.sol#L27-L36
, StableSwapFacet.sol#L393-L454
, ConnextPriceOracle.sol#L175-L180
, StableSwap.sol#L61-L93
, LibDiamond.sol#L95-L118
, LibDiamond.sol#L120-L136
, LibDiamond.sol#L138-L155
, LibDiamond.sol#L157-L167
, SwapUtils.sol#L173-L221
, SwapUtils.sol#L241-L276 (For both)
, SwapUtils.sol#L286-L321 (For all three)
, SwapUtils.sol#L336-L348
, SwapUtils.sol#L388-L433 (For both)
, SwapUtils.sol#L549-L562
, SwapUtils.sol#L581-L606
, SwapUtils.sol#L817-L898 (For both)
, SwapUtils.sol#L909-L935
, SwapUtils.sol#L986-L1046 (For all three)
, SwapUtils.sol#L1053-L1062
Description:
(This is only relevant if you are using the default solidity checked arithmetic). i++
involves checked arithmetic, which is not required. This is because the value of i
is always strictly less than length <= 2**256 - 1. Therefore, the theoretical maximum value of i
to enter the for-loop body is 2**256 - 2
. This means that the i++
in the for loop can never overflow. Regardless, the overflow checks are performed by the compiler.
Unfortunately, the Solidity optimizer is not smart enough to detect this and remove the checks. One can manually do this by:
for (uint i = 0; i < length; i = unchecked_inc(i)) { // do something that doesn't change the value of i } function unchecked_inc(uint i) returns (uint) { unchecked { return i + 1; } }
Note that it’s important that the call to unchecked_inc
is inlined. This is only possible for solidity versions starting from 0.8.2
.
Recommendation: The increment in the for loop post condition can be made unchecked.
require()
, Use != 0
Instead of > 0
With Uint ValuesContext: ConnextPriceOracle.sol#L142-L156
, AmplificationUtils.sol#79-L103 (For L86)
, LibDiamond.sol#120-L136 (For L121)
, LibDiamond.sol#138-L155 (For L139)
, LibDiamond.sol#157-L167 (For L158)
, LibDiamond.sol#222-L240 (For L226)
, LibDiamond.sol#L242-L248 (For L247)
Description:
In a require, when checking a uint, using != 0
instead of > 0
saves 6 gas. This will jump over or avoid an extra ISZERO
opcode.
Recommendation:
Use != 0
instead of > 0
with uint values but only in require()
statements.
Context: All Contracts
Description:
You can cut out 10 opcodes in the creation-time EVM bytecode if you declare a constructor payable. Making the constructor payable eliminates the need for an initial check of msg.value == 0
and saves 21 gas on deployment with no security risks.
Recommendation: Set the constructor to payable.
Context: All Contracts
Description:
Contracts most called functions could simply save gas by function ordering via Method ID. Calling a function at runtime will be cheaper if the function is positioned earlier in the order (has a relatively lower Method ID) because 22 gas are added to the cost of a function for every position that came before it. The caller can save on gas if you prioritize most called functions. One could use This tool
to help find alternative function names with lower Method IDs while keeping the original name intact.
Recommendation:
Find a lower method ID name for the most called functions for example mostCalled()
vs. mostCalled_41q()
is cheaper by 44 gas.