Platform: Code4rena
Start Date: 08/06/2022
Pot Size: $115,000 USDC
Total HM: 26
Participants: 72
Period: 11 days
Judge: leastwood
Total Solo HM: 14
Id: 132
League: ETH
Rank: 19/72
Findings: 1
Award: $699.64
🌟 Selected for report: 0
🚀 Solo Findings: 0
🌟 Selected for report: BowTiedWardens
Also found by: 0x1f8b, 0x29A, 0x52, 0xNazgul, 0xNineDec, 0xf15ers, 0xkatana, 0xmint, Chom, ElKu, Funen, IllIllI, JMukesh, Jujic, Kaiziron, Lambda, MiloTruck, Ruhum, SmartSek, SooYa, TerrierLover, TomJ, WatchPug, Waze, _Adam, asutorufos, auditor0517, bardamu, c3phas, catchup, cccz, ch13fd357r0y3r, cloudjunky, cmichel, cryptphi, csanuragjain, defsec, fatherOfBlocks, hansfriese, hyh, jayjonah8, joestakey, k, kenta, obtarian, oyc_109, robee, sach1r0, shenwilly, simon135, slywaters, sorrynotsorry, tintin, unforgiven, xiaoming90, zzzitron
699.644 USDC - $699.64
On ConnextPriceOracle.sol, we are using latestRoundData, but there is no check if the return value indicates stale data.
function getPriceFromChainlink(address _tokenAddress) public view returns (uint256) { AggregatorV3Interface aggregator = aggregators[_tokenAddress]; if (address(aggregator) != address(0)) { (, int256 answer, , , ) = aggregator.latestRoundData(); // It's fine for price to be 0. We have two price feeds. if (answer == 0) { return 0; }
This could lead to stale prices according to the Chainlink documentation:
https://docs.chain.link/docs/historical-price-data/#historical-rounds https://docs.chain.link/docs/faq/#how-can-i-check-if-the-answer-to-a-round-is-being-carried-over-from-a-previous-round
None
function getPriceFromChainlink(address _tokenAddress) public view returns (uint256) { AggregatorV3Interface aggregator = aggregators[_tokenAddress]; if (address(aggregator) != address(0)) { - (, int256 answer, , , ) = aggregator.latestRoundData(); + (uint80 roundID, int256 answer, , uint256 timestamp, uint80 answeredInRound) = oracle.latestRoundData(); + require(answeredInRound >= roundID, "Stale price"); + require(timestamp != 0,"Round not complete"); + require(answer > 0,"Chainlink answer reporting 0");
#0 - ecmendenhall
2022-06-20T05:30:41Z
Duplicate of #190
#1 - jakekidd
2022-06-24T21:39:49Z