Platform: Code4rena
Start Date: 14/06/2022
Pot Size: $50,000 USDC
Total HM: 19
Participants: 99
Period: 5 days
Judge: HardlyDifficult
Total Solo HM: 4
Id: 136
League: ETH
Rank: 57/99
Findings: 2
Award: $80.35
🌟 Selected for report: 0
🚀 Solo Findings: 0
🌟 Selected for report: joestakey
Also found by: 0x1f8b, 0x29A, 0x52, 0xDjango, 0xNazgul, 0xNineDec, 0xf15ers, 0xkowloon, 0xmint, 8olidity, BowTiedWardens, Chom, Cityscape, Czar102, ElKu, FSchmoede, Funen, GimelSec, GreyArt, IllIllI, KIntern, Kaiziron, Kenshin, Lambda, MadWookie, MiloTruck, PPrieditis, Picodes, Ruhum, Sm4rty, StErMi, TerrierLover, TomJ, Treasure-Seeker, VAD37, WatchPug, Wayne, _Adam, a12jmx, abhinavmir, antonttc, apostle0x01, asutorufos, berndartmueller, cccz, cloudjunky, codexploder, cryptphi, csanuragjain, defsec, delfin454000, fatherOfBlocks, georgypetrov, hake, hansfriese, horsefacts, hyh, k, kenta, nxrblsrpr, oyc_109, peritoflores, rajatbeladiya, reassor, rfa, robee, sach1r0, saian, samruna, shenwilly, simon135, sorrynotsorry, sseefried, throttle, unforgiven, wagmi, zzzitron
49.0983 USDC - $49.10
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-infinity/blob/765376fa238bbccd8b1e2e12897c91098c7e5ac6/contracts/staking/InfinityStaker.sol#L375
INFINITY_TREASURY
what are the implications of setting this to zero?
Users selling for a maker buyer might accidentally enter msg.value
and lose their ETH.
I suggest adding a check to ensure that it is only possible to have msg.value > 0
if isMakerSeller == true
.
uint16 public THREE_MONTH_PENALTY = 2; uint16 public SIX_MONTH_PENALTY = 3; uint16 public TWELVE_MONTH_PENALTY = 4;
require(amount != 0, 'stake amount cant be 0');
Error message should be 'unstake amount cant be 0'.
#0 - HardlyDifficult
2022-07-12T07:35:26Z
🌟 Selected for report: IllIllI
Also found by: 0v3rf10w, 0x1f8b, 0x29A, 0xAsm0d3us, 0xDjango, 0xKitsune, 0xNazgul, 0xf15ers, 0xkatana, 0xkowloon, BowTiedWardens, Chom, ElKu, FSchmoede, Funen, GimelSec, Kaiziron, Kenshin, Lambda, MadWookie, MiloTruck, PPrieditis, Picodes, PwnedNoMore, StErMi, Tadashi, TerrierLover, TomJ, Tomio, Wayne, Waze, _Adam, antonttc, apostle0x01, asutorufos, c3phas, codexploder, defsec, delfin454000, fatherOfBlocks, hake, hansfriese, hyh, joestakey, k, kenta, oyc_109, peritoflores, reassor, rfa, robee, sach1r0, simon135, slywaters, zer0dot
31.2475 USDC - $31.25
There is no need to have both a fallback()
and receive()
function. You can eliminate one.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-infinity/blob/765376fa238bbccd8b1e2e12897c91098c7e5ac6/contracts/staking/InfinityStaker.sol#L55
uint16
is more gas expensive than uint256
require(IERC20(INFINITY_TOKEN).balanceOf(msg.sender) >= amount, 'insufficient balance to stake');
safeTransferFrom
already checks for user balance, so check above is redundant and a waist of gas.
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-infinity/blob/765376fa238bbccd8b1e2e12897c91098c7e5ac6/contracts/core/InfinityOrderBookComplication.sol#L73-L77
Check serves no purpose as parameters isOrdersTimeValid
and itemsIntersect
are set above to true
.
I suggest removing the parameters and the check.