Nouns DAO contest - newfork01's results

A DAO-driven NFT project on Ethereum.

General Information

Platform: Code4rena

Start Date: 22/08/2022

Pot Size: $50,000 USDC

Total HM: 4

Participants: 160

Period: 5 days

Judge: gzeon

Total Solo HM: 2

Id: 155

League: ETH

Nouns DAO

Findings Distribution

Researcher Performance

Rank: 145/160

Findings: 1

Award: $16.66

🌟 Selected for report: 0

🚀 Solo Findings: 0

description

calldata should be used instead of memory for function parameters saves gas if the function argument is only read.

https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/Inflator.sol#L32

https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/NounsDescriptorV2.sol#L401 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/NounsDescriptorV2.sol#L411 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/NounsDescriptorV2.sol#L423 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/NounsDescriptorV2.sol#L424 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/NounsDescriptorV2.sol#L467

https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/NounsToken.sol#L128

description

Uninitialized variables are assigned with the types default value.

Explicitly initializing a variable with it's default value costs unnecessary gas.

Suggest not initializing the for loop counter to 0.

An array’s length should be cached to save gas in for-loops

Reading array length at each iteration of the loop takes 6 gas (3 for mload and 3 to place memory_offset) in the stack.

Caching the array length in the stack saves around 3 gas per iteration.

Suggest storing the array’s length in a variable before the for-loop, and use it instead:

++i costs less gas compared to i++

++i costs less gas compared to i++ for unsigned integer, as pre-increment is cheaper (about 5 gas per iteration)

Suggest using ++i instead of i++ to increment the value of an uint variable.

Increments can be unchecked

In Solidity 0.8+, there’s a default overflow check on unsigned integers. It’s possible to uncheck this in for-loops and save some gas at each iteration, but at the cost of some code readability, as this uncheck cannot be made inline.

taking all of the above, the recommended format for gas savings is

for (uint256 i; i < numIterations;) { // ... unchecked { ++i; } }

https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/NounsArt.sol#L131 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/NounsArt.sol#L432

https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/NounsDescriptor.sol#L110 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/NounsDescriptor.sol#L120 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/NounsDescriptor.sol#L130 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/NounsDescriptor.sol#L140 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/NounsDescriptor.sol#L150 https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/NounsDescriptor.sol#L160

https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-nounsdao/blob/main/contracts/SVGRenderer.sol#L111

AuditHub

A portfolio for auditors, a security profile for protocols, a hub for web3 security.

Built bymalatrax © 2024

Auditors

Browse

Contests

Browse

Get in touch

ContactTwitter