Juicebox Buyback Delegate - lukris02's results

Thousands of projects use Juicebox to fund, operate, and scale their ideas & communities transparently on Ethereum.

General Information

Platform: Code4rena

Start Date: 18/05/2023

Pot Size: $24,500 USDC

Total HM: 3

Participants: 72

Period: 4 days

Judge: LSDan

Id: 237

League: ETH

Juicebox

Findings Distribution

Researcher Performance

Rank: 31/72

Findings: 1

Award: $16.19

QA:
grade-b

🌟 Selected for report: 0

🚀 Solo Findings: 0

QA Report for Juicebox Buyback Delegate contest

Overview

During the audit, 1 low and 3 non-critical issues were found.

â„–TitleRisk RatingInstance Count
L-1Missing check for zero addressLow4
NC-1Unused importsNon-Critical1
NC-2Empty function bodiesNon-Critical1
NC-3Constant is missing a leading underscoreNon-Critical1

Low Risk Findings(1)

L-1. Missing check for zero address

Description

If address(0x0) is set it may cause the contract to revert or work wrong.

Instances
Recommendation

Add checks.

Non-Critical Risk Findings(3)

NC-1. Unused imports

Instances
Recommendation

Remove the import if it is not needed.

NC-2. Empty function bodies

Description

The code should be refactored such that empty blocks no longer exist, or the block should do something useful, such as emitting an event or reverting. Or, there should be comments why the block is empty.

Instances

NC-3. Constant is missing a leading underscore

Description

Internal and private constants should have a leading underscore.

Instances
Recommendation

Add leading underscores for private constants.

#0 - c4-judge

2023-06-02T11:03:53Z

dmvt marked the issue as grade-b

AuditHub

A portfolio for auditors, a security profile for protocols, a hub for web3 security.

Built bymalatrax © 2024

Auditors

Browse

Contests

Browse

Get in touch

ContactTwitter