Platform: Code4rena
Start Date: 04/03/2024
Pot Size: $36,500 USDC
Total HM: 9
Participants: 80
Period: 7 days
Judge: hansfriese
Total Solo HM: 2
Id: 332
League: ETH
Rank: 78/80
Findings: 1
Award: $1.47
🌟 Selected for report: 0
🚀 Solo Findings: 0
🌟 Selected for report: DarkTower
Also found by: 0xJaeger, 0xJoyBoy03, 0xRiO, 0xkeesmark, 0xlemon, 0xmystery, Abdessamed, AcT3R, Afriauditor, AgileJune, Al-Qa-qa, Aymen0909, Daniel526, DanielTan_MetaTrust, Dots, FastChecker, Fitro, GoSlang, Greed, Krace, McToady, SoosheeTheWise, Tripathi, asui, aua_oo7, btk, crypticdefense, d3e4, dd0x7e8, dvrkzy, gesha17, iberry, kR1s, leegh, marqymarq10, n1punp, pa6kuda, radin100, sammy, smbv-1923, trachev, turvy_fuzz, valentin_s2304, wangxx2026, y4y, yotov721, yvuchev, zhaojie
1.4652 USDC - $1.47
After the yieldFeeRecipient
invokes part of the yield fee, all yield fee will be reset, and the yieldFeeRecipient
cannot obtain the remaining fee, resulting in the loss of user funds.
Let's look at this function,yieldFeeBalance
should subtract _shares
instead of _yieldFeeBalance
:
function claimYieldFeeShares(uint256 _shares) external onlyYieldFeeRecipient { if (_shares == 0) revert MintZeroShares(); uint256 _yieldFeeBalance = yieldFeeBalance; if (_shares > _yieldFeeBalance) revert SharesExceedsYieldFeeBalance(_shares, _yieldFeeBalance); @> yieldFeeBalance -= _yieldFeeBalance; _mint(msg.sender, _shares); emit ClaimYieldFeeShares(msg.sender, _shares); }
vscode, manual
function claimYieldFeeShares(uint256 _shares) external onlyYieldFeeRecipient { if (_shares == 0) revert MintZeroShares(); uint256 _yieldFeeBalance = yieldFeeBalance; if (_shares > _yieldFeeBalance) revert SharesExceedsYieldFeeBalance(_shares, _yieldFeeBalance); - yieldFeeBalance -= _yieldFeeBalance; + yieldFeeBalance -= _shares; _mint(msg.sender, _shares); emit ClaimYieldFeeShares(msg.sender, _shares); }
Error
#0 - c4-pre-sort
2024-03-11T21:54:07Z
raymondfam marked the issue as sufficient quality report
#1 - c4-pre-sort
2024-03-11T21:54:43Z
raymondfam marked the issue as duplicate of #10
#2 - c4-pre-sort
2024-03-13T04:38:31Z
raymondfam marked the issue as duplicate of #59
#3 - c4-judge
2024-03-15T07:37:30Z
hansfriese changed the severity to 3 (High Risk)
#4 - c4-judge
2024-03-15T07:38:58Z
hansfriese marked the issue as satisfactory